links


21
Sep 11

Things to read

Jeff Sonderman finds too many apps behaving as modern day shovelware. And that should not be. Apps should solve a problem.

News organizations whose mobile apps only provide users with their articles or videos are missing a big opportunity.

An application, by definition, should be applied to perform a task, to solve a problem. Most news doesn’t do that.

Rather than just feed readers recent stories you wrote about their problems, apps can provide tools and data that enable users to actually solve their problems. When you solve problems, you get more loyal users and a chance to make more money.

I love this because it will become one of those points that is so obvious we’ll wonder why we overlooked it. Consider your favorite, most frequently used apps.

Flipping through my phone I clearly have many problems to solve as Sonderman puts it. There’s:

an alarm clock to wake me up;
weather apps (I have many radars) to keep me informed;
camera to document things;
photo/video editing apps which process what I record;
a QR reader, for when those things finally get popular here;
voice recorders, vital for interviews;
my indispensable RSS reader educates and entertains me;
social media apps to listen and talk;
reference apps like Wikipedia and Dictionary to help me learn;
What Was There gives me a sense of history in a specific place;
audio and video apps make sure I’m never bored;
food apps give me reviews and ideas;
shopping apps to buy things and
local apps to keep me in the know.

The things I use the most are apps that serve a function, beyond just saying “Here you go.”

No app should work without a social media component, and it should be more than “Tweet that you’re using this app” or “I’m here” or “I’m listening to…” all of which are appropriately pointless.

Apps should dream up ways to allow someone to upload something to contribute, which is my only complaint of the otherwise lovely What Was There mentioned above. I love that one, but you have to go to the site to upload things into the cloud, and into their conversation and others’ knowledge base.

Look, the simple truth is mobile is rapidly arriving, immediate future. Whatever tool the end user chooses — something in your pocket, purse or backpack or some fantastic thing not yet invented — apps, for as long as they exist as movers and shakers, are going to need to be a dynamic multi-lane stream of information.

If your app should help me solve my problem, wouldn’t it be nifty if another user of that app could too?

Things you heard on the playground that turn out to be true:

Research at Nanjing University has found that strands of RNA from vegetables make it into our bloodstream after we eat them, and can regulate the expression of our genes once they’re inside us.

MicroRNAs, or miRNAs, are little strands of RNA that selectively bind to matching sequences of messenger RNA, resulting in repression of those genes. Their role has only been understood in the last decade or so, but miRNAs are currently believed to take part in a vast number of processes in both plants and animals.

Turns out you are what you eat. Keep that in mind at the dinner table.


14
Sep 11

Still a busy week

Have you ever written one thing over and over?

Yeah. That’s where I am today.

Anyway, the second issue of this year’s paper is out. Looks pretty nice, too.

octagon

Lots of areas the hardworking student-journalists can be proud of. Lots of areas for them to improve. That’s about where you should be in the second week.

You can see all the stories online at the also newly relaunched samfordcrimson.com

And now back to the same paragraphs of the same paper. I hate when that happens.


13
Sep 11

Things to read

Hey kids, gather round and let the Boston Globe tell you how they built an all-in-one website. This is a useful approach because, as you know, we are all approaching the Web in our own way, which means the experience is a little better different for you on your laptop than my on my iPhone or the next person on their pad.

Why is this important? Mobile consumption is about to surpass the tied-to-your-desk variety. The current watchdate is 2015.

The year 2015 is when Back to the Future II takes place, too. Just so you know.

What will people be doing online? A little bit of a lot of things, but mostly social media if current trends hold. A lot of news spreads via social networks at this point, so that’s not entirely a bad thing.

There’s also niche news sites, which are becoming a growing field.

Everyone’s friend Andy Carvin, on how he balances the job and his valuable role live-tweeting the Arab world. Sanity is a word that appears in the headline, so that’s something to keep in mind.


12
Sep 11

Things to read

I write these for a blog for work, and just reproduce them here. Like everything else around here, it is an evolving project, evolving right before your eyes, even! They get a bit too long, so I’m breaking them up in both places. Here’s a chunk of them for today, though.

A collection of some of the best 9/11 — 10 years on newspaper covers from around the country. There were many terrific ones to see.

Of all of the great pages to see, this is my favorite. The infographic style is also an example of turning a now decade-old story into something contemporaneous. If you read nothing else, click that link and read the first lines and then the bottom right corner. Here’s the supporting story.

Seems the Guardian overreached in trying to do a realtime feed of Sept. 11. The article talks about the still developing boundaries of Twitter. I think it just as importantly speaks to the “We made this culture” culture of Twitter, which is still evolving, and being driven by the masses, not what a news outlet thinks. Also it gets to the importance of listening in a conversation. Guardian tried something, the audience didn’t like it, told them and the paper, to their credit, listened.


9
Sep 11

Things to read

How did members of the college media covered the biggest story of their young career? From studentpressblogs.org:

(T)he Associated Collegiate Press is making available a PDF file of its book, “9-11: The College Press Responds.” The book was published in Spring 2002 and includes a wide range of examples of how college newspapers covered the story.

You can see it, terrific, terrible stuff, as a PDF.