Good for 63.73 percent of the people in the poll below; they said ‘Who cares?’

Didn’t you love Catember? We love Catember. That’s the fourth year I’ve put that on the site, and it is probably one of the more popular things going. You can follow this link to the Catember category and see all of them. Allie is wacky as ever.

This morning she got locked in a linen closet. Because if you go to that part of the house then you must be going into that room. And if you are going into that room it must be because you are going to open the door for her.

It is a neat trick, really. She jumps up to a second shelf, while ducking down to avoid hitting the third shelf and fitting in a narrow space on top of beach towels. She likes to be on clean things. Very fussy.

Talked about news leads in class today. Riveting stuff. Here are some of the slides:

My favorite part is finding examples of bad leads. New York Times, student media, the local pros. None of us are immune. I read a dreadful one out of the old gray lady today. It violated almost every rule of thumb you would ordinarily use.

Otherwise, the day passed as it should.

Things to read that I thought you might find interesting:

Auburn-Opelika named as top place to retire

More than 2,000 NASA workers in Huntsville look to Washington today as government shutdown looms

Shutdown would lead to 2,000 civilian furloughs, no pay for military at Maxwell

Here’s an interesting profile on author and “performer” Malcolm Gladwell who has a new book out. He addresses critics. And his hair is still artistically unkempt:

“When you write about sports, you’re allowed to engage in mischief,” he says. “Nothing is at stake. It’s a bicycle race!” As a serious amateur runner himself (just the other day, he finished the Fifth Avenue Mile race, in Manhattan, in five minutes and three seconds) he’s “totally anti-doping … But what I’m trying to say is, look, we have to come up with better reasons. Our reasons suck! And when the majority has taken a position that’s ill thought-through, it’s appropriate to make trouble.” His expression settles into a characteristic half-smile that makes clear he’d relish it if you disagreed.

Here’s an insightful New Yorker piece on the Guardian taking on the British government:

At 5:23 p.m., roughly eight hours after the encounter in his office, Rusbridger ordered the Guardian to post the G.C.H.Q. story on its Web site and then in its print edition. Although the British government had taken no further action, the mood in the Guardian’s offices was anxious. As the stories based on Snowden’s revelations were taking shape, Rusbridger had hired additional security for the building and established a secure office two floors above the newsroom, just down the corridor from the advertising department, to house the documents. When he flew to New York to work with his team there on the stories, “he couldn’t talk on the phone,” his wife, Lindsay Mackie, said. “He couldn’t say what was going on.”

It has been the Guardian’s biggest story so far. With eighty-four million monthly visitors, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations, the Guardian Web site is now the third most popular English-language newspaper Web site in the world, behind London’s Daily Mail, with its celebrity gossip and abundant cleavage, and the New York Times. But its print circulation, of a hundred and ninety thousand, is half what it was in 2002. The Guardian, which is supported by the Scott Trust, established nearly eighty years ago to subsidize an “independent” and “liberal” newspaper, has lost money for nine straight years. In the most recent fiscal year, the paper lost thirty-one million pounds (about fifty million dollars), an improvement over the forty-four million pounds it lost the year before.

Last year, Andrew Miller, the director of the trust and the C.E.O. of the Guardian Media Group, warned that the trust’s money would be exhausted in three to five years if the losses were not dramatically reduced. To save the Guardian, Rusbridger has pushed to transform it into a global digital newspaper, aimed at engaged, anti-establishment readers and available entirely for free. In 2011, Guardian U.S., a digital-only edition, was expanded, followed this year by the launch of an Australian online edition. It’s a grand experiment, he concedes: just how free can a free press be?

For reasons big and small beyond this story I really, really hope they make it.

Somebody had to say it. I say it to my freshmen (your job is learning as much as you can and selecting and sharing the most critical parts) and I’ve told it to old reporters (do what you do best and link to the rest) and pretty much anyone in between (solicit and cultivate your community) who’d care to disagree. But the truth is the truth. Journalism *is* curation: tips on curation tools and techniques:

Curation is a relatively new term in journalism, but the practice is as old as journalism itself. Every act of journalism is an act of curation: think of how a news report or feature selects and combines elements from a range of sources (first hand sources, background facts, first or second hand colour). Not only that: every act of publishing is, too: selecting and combining different types of content to ensure a news or content ‘mix’.

Amazon’s Jeff Bezos in his talk to employees at the Washington Post said: “People will buy a package … they will not pay for a story.” Previously that package was limited to what your staff produced, and wire copy. But as more content becomes digitised, it is possible to combine more content from a wider variety of sources in a range of media – and on any one of a number of platforms.

Curation is nothing new – but it is becoming harder.

It is becoming faster, with stronger feedback, and with more and more places to monitor and share. So, in that sense, yes, it is harder. Really it is more intensive, and more thorough.

And then there’s this embarrassment: AJ and Katherine: A kiss is just a kiss, or is it? (poll)

We can’t let people live their personal lives. And by people I mean a young woman who’s caught a minor bit of celebrity in the most 21st century way possible and a college student. We must speculate. Are they on or off? Here’s a photo gallery! And take this poll! Now let’s bring in our kiss expert (“lukewarm at best”) who is really, and I’m not making this up, the public safety reporter.

A commenter wrote “AL.com, please use the poll results to help refine the amount of time you spend covering Katherine Webb stories. Thanks.”

Others:

Carol’s reply:

It is a good thing bandwidth is cheap. So is the content.

This entry was posted on Monday, September 30th, 2013 at 10:39 pm and is filed under Catember, journalism, links, Monday, Samford, things to read. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One comment