video


20
May 15

Visual journalism at the BBC

Today we had the privilege of meeting Amanda Farnsworth, and Bella Hurrell, the editor and assistant editor of visual journalism at the BBC. They gave us a tour of their new, amazing, newsroom. Here’s the overhead map:

Farnsworth told us the BBC will be merging more of their products now that their national elections are over. She said it is already happening in video “with a vengeance. You can see even at the technical level TV and the web are coming together. We are trying to make that happen everyday.”

Visual journalism at the BBC is staffed by TV graphics personnel, editors, online designers, developers and coders. They’re faced with eternal challenges and goals of standing out distinctively, being lively and modern and creating understanding.

Here’s a glimpse of the newsroom from what would be the top-left corner of that graphic above:

There’s a challenge the BBC has that you don’t see framed the same way at home. Everyone in the UK pays 145 pounds annually and gets the eight channels, radio and on demand. That drives a lot of programming, Farnsworth said.

“We have to produce content that appeals to everyone. We have to produce content that does appeal to a narrow group.”

One of three identical control rooms the newsroom can use:

Farnsworth showed us a few apps they’ve developed, and then discussed how they’ve used those to create web and television packages. They have some called “personal relevance calculators,” like the “What class are you?” app. They put a reporter on the street and stood up passersby, asking questions from the app which were derived by sociologists work. The data then tried to help the audience determine where they fit in the social strata.

Hurrell showed us the video. “For us what was important is that it worked across (media) platforms.”

And of course all of that is shareable, linkable.

“We think of something that tells a story that’s reusable. That’s where the personal relevance comes back into play. How much property do you have? What’s your health like? How much money do you make compared to big sports stars?

Farnsworth showed us their green screen room and the interactivity they’ve created from it. They put a reporter in there for a piece on “How to put a human on Mars.”

The Mars model was made by a TV 3D designer and the video was a 3D virtual reality design. Farnsworth said that’s something they’re looking to do more of in the future.

She showed us another video of an interactive video using TouchCast — which I have and love and should actually use — that helped tell the Deepwater Horizon story. This was an interactive video, using the TouchCast technology that lets you manipulate things within the video rather than clicking items outside of the video box.

Farnsworth says they’ve done a great deal of experimentation with that sort of thing, but they aren’t very successful. (Yet, I’d say.)

“They’re not very popular because, I think, people don’t know what to do with it, but we want to lead the way.”

Aside: Do you know what I hear from media entities everywhere I go? (No matter what country I’m in … ) “We’re behind in that.” Daily Mirror and BBC would each tell you, for example, that they were late into jumping into the social media pool. Farnsworth essentially told us that today. But now, here, the Beeb is saying they want to lead the way. When a humongous property like the BBC, or some other national/global property, decides to make the imprint, they’re going to dictate usability terms, rather than the users doing it from bottom up. This is going to be fascinating.

One of the boards they use to observe realtime status updates on stories. It is like air traffic control:

She talked about some ISIS projects they’ve built with an in-screen graphic overlay that promotes interaction. This is about “putting users in control versus watching, giving users choices.”

The BBC was a big part of this incredible, incredible, Bob Dylan project. You can’t embed it, and I can’t do it justice, but go watch this presentation by Dylan and Interlude.

That’s an amazing promotional, entertainment tool. But it isn’t all fun and games. The BBC, of course, still does the heavy lifting of traditional journalism and the even heavier lifting of data journalism. Hurrell said they’re crunching huge sets of data, often down the postal code level. She said they’re also doing one global data project each month. One of their recent projects had to do with tracking global jihadist attacks.

And all of this has to be done with an eye toward designing across platforms. Which device for this? Which device for that? Here’s the note that makes you stand up in take note. On the weekends, the majority of the BBC’s consumption takes place on mobile devices. That’s a trend that started in 2013.

An overhead view of a portion of the BBC newsroom:

Then Hurrell talked about #BBCGoFigure, which was one of my favorite things about the meeting — and there was plenty to love. But this is a social first infographic strand, atomized data journalism with just two data points. This is a daily infographic. You can see examples of it here. Why everyone isn’t doing this escapes me.

The plan with social media, Farnsworth said, is that you go to the best place. (This varies by time and circumstance.) The best social media, she says, is one that engenders conversation. (See the #BBCGoFigure note above.)

“During the campaign,” Farnsworth said, “we did a lot more social media because we could see how important it has become.”

And this impacted their TV work. They used similar color palettes for the web and television, and put movable, shareable policy cards into action to help explain the political parties during election season. The interactive cards looked the same as the ones you could see on broadcast.

Then there was election night. It comes once every five years in the U.K., so the BBC pulls out all of the toys. They shot Downing Street and then put it up on their green screen for wonderfully immersive segments on explaining the election results. Here’s a short clip:

Here’s another one from “inside” the House of Commons:

The BBC is a great trip. They had to get back to work, but I want to see the entire operation. You get the sense that this is, perhaps, what a modern newsroom should feel like. And you wonder how many of them there are. Not nearly enough.


16
May 15

Stonehenge

It is smaller than you’d imagine. You can get closer to it than you think. And aside from the other people and the ropes and whatever curious, cosmic thing the location was doing to my camera lens, this isn’t a bad little atmospheric video:

Here we are:

Stonehenge

Nearby are early Bronze Age burial mounds, knowns as Cursus barrows. The people buried in those mounds lived a few centuries after the stones were put in place. A huge earthwork enclosure was built about a millennia before the stones were raised. You can walk the Cursus enclosure, and if you figure out their purpose, you’ll be the first one. No one knows for sure why the early Neolithic people put in the effort.

If you know how to look for it, you can see the Avenue, which are parallel banks of ditches. It links Stonehenge to the river Avon. (One of the four Avons, as we learned in the previous post‘s video.) The Avenue was put into place around 2300 BC, around the time the bluestones were being rearranged. The part nearest the stones are still low earthworks, the rest are plowed flat. The section lines up nicely with the midsummer sunrise and midwinter sunset.

Click to embiggen this one in a new browser tab:

Stonehenge

The ruins you and I know are several different stages of work, starting about 5,000 years ago, with the big circle. A few centuries passed before the sarsen stones were placed in the horseshoe and then a circle with the bluestones put between them. Some time later the bluestones were rearranged. Some have fallen since then, some have been removed. Then, during the middle of the 20th century some were reinstalled during a 45-year restoration project.

Cowslip flowers are all over the region:

Stonehenge


16
May 15

The Roman Baths

Still in Bath, at the historic feature that defines and named the town. The touring here is almost entirely indoors. You need more time than we were allowed, to be honest. And the design of the tour, which is 100 percent determined by the historical plumbing, is not conducive to the number of people they let inside at one time.

If you’re interested in the history of the Romans in Britannia, this is a great place to come, but do it during a slow period. The foot traffic was all but intolerable.

Nevertheless, there is plenty to see here. You first get a view of the famous bath from above. And you’re told to not drink, swim, dive, touch, lick, perspire in, think about or wink at the water. But you can go right up to it, later in your self-guided tour.

Best part of the tour:

There are statues of the Roman governors of the province of Britannia. Mixed among them are likenesses of Roman emperors with particular connections to Britain. I’d like you to meet them now.

This is Julius Caesar. He invaded Britain twice: in 55 and 54 BC. The first time it was late summer, and less than a full-scale move. It was unsuccessful, giving him no more than a beachhead toehold at Kent. During his second visit the Romans installed a king friendly to Rome, but there wasn’t a lot of territory conquered. There were between one and four million people in Britain at the time.

Here’s the emperor Claudius. The Roman conquest started under his reign, in 43 AD. Literature and monuments suggest he won with minimal bloodshed. The locals were already beaten.

That brings us to Vespasian, who fought for Claudius before, a few decades later, oversaw the Roman expansion in the modern British Isles.

Here’s Ostorius Scapula, a Roman general who governed Britain from 47 until his death five years later. He was more of a tactician than a politican, and is thought to be buried somewhere nearby in Wales, where much of his military campaigning took place.

Suetonius Paulinus came to power as governor in 58 and his first two years on the job were considered successful. He was the lead man for more than a few battles, perhaps the largest being when he stood with an army of 10,000 Romans against a mob of Britons estimated at almost a quarter-million strong. The Romans and their discipline won, and won big. Some 400 Romans were killed, compared to reports of almost 80,000 of the locals. It turned into a slaughter.

He was, perhaps, too good at his job as a military governor. The Romans took him out of the job, fearing that his fighting would lead to stronger and more bitter resistance.

Julius Agricola was given a military command in Britain, where his military career had also started. When it ended in 73, he was made patrician in Rome and appointed governor of Gallia Aquitania. In 77 he was tapped as consul and governor of Britannia and he completed the conquest of what is now Wales and northern England. He marched on the far northern territories of Scotland and established forts across much of the Lowlands. He went home in 85. He died eight years later at the age of 53.

Here’s Hadrian, emperor from 117 to 138. He rebuilt the Pantheon and constructed the Temple of Venus and Roma. Perhaps you’ve heard of Hadrian’s Wall, which marked the northern limit of Britannia. He visited in 122, after hearing of a revolt there in the previous years. but never saw that wall finished. He went off to fight some rebels in Africa and then visited his beloved Greece, then Asia and then Egypt and finally back to Rome in 133, ending the ultimate road trip. He never returned to Britain.

Which brings us to the last statue, of Constantine the Great. He was the Roman Emperor from 306 to 337 AD. As a younger man he fought north of Hadrian’s Wall. His dominion consisted of Britain, Gaul, and Spain. He therefore commanded one of the largest Roman armies, stationed along the important Rhine frontier. He founded Constantinople, of course, and also stopped Christian persecutions and legalized Christianity. In 325 he summoned the famous Council of Nicaea.

The Temple pediment is one of the highlights of the Bath tour, and it is one of only two truly classical temples from Roman Britain. An animation shows how the pediment would have looked in Roman times.

The pediment features the image of a fearsome head carved in Bath stone and it is thought to be the Gorgon’s Head which was a powerful symbol of the goddess Sulis Minerva.

Inside the temple you would have found the statue of the goddess Sulis Minerva. The gilt bronze head is one of the best known objects from Roman Britain. The head may well date from the first century AD. There are six layers of gilding. The first two use a technique known as fire gilding and the four later layers are applied as gold leaf. There is corrosion which has affected it in parts where it lay in the ground for over a thousand years. And you can also see a rectangular cut beneath the chin, thought to be a repair from a casting flaw.

The Bath from ground level. I just imagine Roman lifeguards yelling “No running on the deck!”

The engineering is impressive, still in operation and the tour lets you see some fine examples of Roman handiwork and ingenuity. There are plenty of video screens and dioramas trying to explain life in Roman Britannia. There are tin scrolls where people wrote out curses against those that wrong them. There are impressive coin displays, with currency covering a span of 1,700 years. The oldest coin is as far removed from the newest coin as we are. It is remarkable to consider in terms like that.

Here’s a 40-second video dose from inside the facility:

And, finally:


12
May 15

Travel day

Quiet

I watched Unbroken today:

And I watched The Wedding Ringer:

That’s the one where the guy, fresh off meeting Hitch and hiring Adam Sandler to sing at the big event, hires Kevin Hart to be his best man. Brilliant!

Also, watched The Judge, which really doesn’t have anything to do with any of these others, but is a nice film when you’re in the mood for a good story that doesn’t need explosions:

Oh, also, we’re in London. Two weeks here and then on to another adventure. So there’s going to be a lot of pictures here over the next several days, probably.

And now, to deal with the jet lag.


25
Apr 15

Sleepy Saturday

I’m not ashamed to say it. I slept in. Very, very late. We went to a baseball game.

Before the game I sprawled out on the floor to stretch my back and shoulders and promptly fell asleep.

At the park we sat through a brief weather delay, during which I shot this video:

It is a Hyperlapse video — and you don’t hear about those much any more for some reason. That’s a little over three minutes of clouds moving directly overhead. I slapped some music on it and uploaded it from my phone because we live in an interesting time where you can record video on a super computer that spends most of its time in your pocket. And not only can you record video there, but you can speed it up, slow it down, edit it and do any number of other great things to that video, all from your telephone.

And then I uploaded it to YouTube because we live in an interesting time where we upload a lot of things to YouTube. And now it is here, because this is where all of my things land.

When play resumed we saw Auburn sweep their first conference series in three years, we went for dinner and then came home.

I’m thinking about going to bed at a reasonable time, too.

It has been that kind of day.