{"id":573884096,"date":"2012-10-30T23:06:58","date_gmt":"2012-10-31T04:06:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/?p=573884096"},"modified":"2012-11-01T17:42:13","modified_gmt":"2012-11-01T22:42:13","slug":"journalism-in-the-clouds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/blog\/2012\/10\/30\/journalism-in-the-clouds\/","title":{"rendered":"Journalism in the clouds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Journalism, journalism, journalism. My day was just eaten up with the stuff. <\/p>\n<p>All of the Sandy material in the world, it must be read, if not looked at. I find it harder and harder to look at hurricane damage. Tornado damage isn&#8217;t easy, but hurricanes, I&#8217;d rather just look away, if only I was allowed. Sometimes the work supersedes the want. Tornado damage, though, has a different scope. Devastating, sure, but to fewer people. The volume of a hurricane&#8217;s destruction is hard to comprehend and that can be a lot to bear. <\/p>\n<p>Tornadoes? Not quite as bad. Or at least that&#8217;s what I thought until the giant tornado carved a path between <a TARGET=\"_blank\"  href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2011_Tuscaloosa_%E2%80%93_Birmingham_tornado\">Tuscaloosa and Birmingham<\/a> last year. I&#8217;ve watched a lot of tornadoes. Chased a few, even. Seeing that monster <a TARGET=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=sA7TKSHJ_wM\">on television<\/a> was hard to watch, though. <a TARGET=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5ohIVzIZLuQ\">This one<\/a>, from the ground during the same storm, I&#8217;ll never forget. The rotation is just behind the mall and you can tell from the shot how hard they were fighting against the wind. Those are <em>just<\/em> tornadoes, though, right?<\/p>\n<p>The humanistic response outweighs the journalistic impulse and I think I&#8217;d be happy never to cover a hurricane, thanks. Just look at the scale:  <\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/t9XAAw5nFes?rel=0\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Showed that in class today. And then we did Associated Press style for the rest of the afternoon. Then I had to give an interview to a student who is working on a project about the <a TARGET=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/News_International_phone_hacking_scandal\">phone hacking scandal<\/a> in London. She was a freshman, but she&#8217;s clearly done a lot of research and put a lot of thought into the project. It was a pleasant surprise. I figured we&#8217;d talk about ethics and process. <em>Behave better, this is how this is supposed to work.<\/em> She wanted to talk about organization. <em>OK then, there were many corrupted people acting unscrupulously, and it seems to go all the way to the top.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>From time to time someone wants to come and interview me about how some aspect of the working media operates. That&#8217;s wonderful and we should have more of that. This young lady pulled out her digital recorder and her pages of notes and I knew I was going to be talking for a while. It was a lot of fun. Hopefully I gave her something useful. And so we did.<\/p>\n<p>Then, of course, tonight is the night the student-journalists put out their paper, too. So I stuck around for that so I could answer important stylistic questions like &#8220;Do you like this? Or that?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s also reading things like:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> <a TARGET=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/2012\/10\/29\/lance-armstrong-shows-why-the-disruption-in-journalism-matters\/\">Lance Armstrong shows why the disruption in journalism matters<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a TARGET=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cjr.org\/behind_the_news\/journalism_ethics_in_a_digital.php\">Journalism ethics in a digital age<\/a><\/p>\n<p>And my favorite, <a TARGET=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media-network\/media-network-blog\/2012\/oct\/29\/drone-journalism-take-off\">Drone journalism set for takeoff \u2013 once they&#8217;re permitted to use our airspace<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I want one:<\/p>\n<p><object width=\"640\" height=\"360\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/NxnWmc0ZTvA?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0\"><\/param><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\"><\/param><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\"><\/param><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/NxnWmc0ZTvA?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" allowfullscreen=\"true\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n<p>And here&#8217;s an entry-level, legal in the U.S. model, the <a TARGET=\"_blank\"  href=\"http:\/\/store.apple.com\/us\/product\/H8859ZM\/A\/parrot-ardrone-20\">Parrot AR.Drone 2.0<\/a> It has limited range and altitude, of course, but it also has two cameras on it. <\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a video from a slightly more expensive make, <a TARGET=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.deadlinedetroit.com\/articles\/1197\/a_lone_drone_in_detroit_airspace_sees_the_city_as_it_never_has_been_seen\">shooting footage over Detroit<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><object width=\"640\" height=\"360\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/LkMiIT1VG98?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0\"><\/param><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\"><\/param><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\"><\/param><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/LkMiIT1VG98?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" allowfullscreen=\"true\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n<p> Clearly you could get some great storm damage footage this way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Journalism, journalism, journalism. My day was just eaten up with the stuff. All of the Sandy material in the world, it must be read, if not looked at. I find it harder and harder to look at hurricane damage. Tornado damage isn&#8217;t easy, but hurricanes, I&#8217;d rather just look away, if only I was allowed. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,25,7,44,8,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-573884096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journalism","category-links","category-samford","category-things-to-read","category-tuesday","category-video"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573884096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=573884096"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573884096\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":573884098,"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573884096\/revisions\/573884098"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=573884096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=573884096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=573884096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}