{"id":573884582,"date":"2013-03-15T14:02:02","date_gmt":"2013-03-15T19:02:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/?p=573884582"},"modified":"2013-03-17T20:40:35","modified_gmt":"2013-03-18T01:40:35","slug":"journalism-topics-to-get-us-through-friday","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/blog\/2013\/03\/15\/journalism-topics-to-get-us-through-friday\/","title":{"rendered":"Journalism topics to get us through Friday"},"content":{"rendered":"

Google Reader is shutting down<\/a>. Google is killing off a power tool used by their power users, citing low traffic and growth. <\/p>\n

So, naturally, in everyone’s attempts to find suitable replacements other reader services are crashing under the strain. This is a low traffic tool to Google now, though they haven’t seemed to entertained the idea of just letting the thing live without their touch — which wouldn’t be much different than the way they’ve treated Reader anyway. <\/p>\n

Jeff Jarvis<\/a>, who literally wrote the book on Google:<\/p>\n

This is the problem of handing over one\u2019s digital life to one company, which can fail or unilaterally kill a service users depend on. Google has the right to kill a shrinking service. But it also has a responsibility to those who depended on it and in this case to the principle of RSS and how it has opened up the web and media. I agree<\/a> with Tim O\u2019Reilly that at the minimum, Google should open-source Reader.<\/p>\n

The killing of Reader sends an unfortunate signal about whether we can count on Google to continue other services we come to need.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In the end the old saying is true. You get what you pay for, even if you are the service yourself<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Lifehacker<\/a> has some alternatives. Digg is counting down, and building their own reader<\/a>.<\/p>\n

And now journalism things from various other places. From PR Daily, 6 ways to run a media room reporters will love<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201cOrganization is key,\u201d said Eileen Melnick McCarthy, senior communications specialist at the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement in Ottawa. \u201cRemember the reporter is your client, so do what it takes to ensure they get what they need.\u201d <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There are six tips, including pre-plan, notifying the media, being prepared and more. <\/p>\n

Poynter has tips on How journalists can become better interviewers<\/a>:<\/p>\n

How do you walk up to strangers and ask them questions<\/a>? How do you get people \u2014 tight-lipped cops, jargon-spouting experts, everyday folks who aren\u2019t accustomed to being interviewed \u2014 to give you useful answers? How do you use quotes effectively in your stories?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That one also has several helpful tips including, you guessed it, be prepared. <\/p>\n

Salon<\/a> takes a negative view of the media ecosystem. It defies excerption, but here’s the final ‘graph: <\/p>\n

There is probably no better evidence that journalism is a public good than the fact that none of America\u2019s financial geniuses can figure out how to make money off it. The comparison to education is striking. When manag\u00aders apply market logic to schools, it fails, because education is a cooperative public service, not a business. Corporatized schools throw underachieving, hard-to-teach kids overboard, discontinue expensive programs, bombard stu\u00addents with endless tests, and then attack teacher salaries and unions as the main impediment to \u201csuccess.\u201d No one has ever made profits doing qual\u00adity education\u2014for-profit education companies seize public funds and make their money by not teaching. In digital news, the same dynamic is producing the same results, and leads to the same conclusion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Meanwhile, Conde Nast is going to video<\/a>:<\/p>\n

The move is part of a broader expansion the company is making into television and digital <\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

For magazine publishers, many of whom are struggling with shrinking readership, building an online portfolio is seen as crucial as both a promotional platform and a new revenue stream.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And speaking of revenues, Alan Mutter discusses why publishers should be worried about retail apps<\/a>:<\/p>\n

From Best Buy to CVS and from Kroger to Macy\u2019s, the biggest buyers of newspaper advertising have launched sophisticated smartphone apps to establish increasingly direct and profitable relationships with individual customers. <\/p>\n

These efforts should give publishers the shivers, because this new channel represents a major threat to the retail lineage that constitutes half of what\u2019s left of the advertising sold by newspapers \u2013 an industry, lest we forget, whose collective print and digital ad sales are less than half the record $49.4 billion achieved in 2005. <\/p>\n

Smartphone apps appeal to retailers, for starters, because they are far cheaper than buying full-page ads and preprint inserts in newspapers. Perhaps even more compelling to merchants is that apps enable them to precisely target offers to individuals, thus achieving not only happier customers but also fatter tickets at the checkout line. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And a new site called FOIA Shaming<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Lastly, stuff from my campus blog: <\/p>\n

New York Times sneak peek<\/a><\/p>\n

When good journalism and good business intertwine<\/a><\/p>\n

Don\u2019t mistake comedy for the truth<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That’s plenty to read over as you head into the weekend. Hope yours is grand!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Google Reader is shutting down. Google is killing off a power tool used by their power users, citing low traffic and growth. So, naturally, in everyone’s attempts to find suitable replacements other reader services are crashing under the strain. This is a low traffic tool to Google now, though they haven’t seemed to entertained the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,35,25,44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-573884582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-friday","category-journalism","category-links","category-things-to-read"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573884582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=573884582"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573884582\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":573884583,"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573884582\/revisions\/573884583"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=573884582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=573884582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kennysmith.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=573884582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}